bwnoob.blogg.se

1. Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 upgrade#
2. Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 full#
3. Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 pro#
4. Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 software#

But I do notice there has been a lot of attention on the first impressions. I have no insight into Gibson's marketing plans. Things that make sense to the long-term SONAR user may be completely bewildering to a new person who happens to turn up on the doorstep. SONAR is great, but most of the users have been immersed in the SONAR culture for many years if not decades. But there is a really big problem with that, and that is FIRST IMPRESSIONS. One would think that the Gibson family would present many opportunities to work on that awareness in the same way Presonus has done for SuudioOne. It is a little frustrating, not that the SONAR market share is so low, but that there seems to be so little awareness of SONAR, which is one of the most established products in the market.

Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 full#

And he upgraded to the full S1 version at the same time I did. In that case, my colleague had switched from Cubase to StudioOne after he got a free disk with a Presonus audio interface, and he found StusioOne was a lot more intuitive than Cubase.

Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 upgrade#

and then I did an upgrade to their full producer product. In my case, I had one of those free disks for a couple of years before I actually installed it in order to collaborate with a colleague.

And of that set, I'd say StudioOne has its base mostly because of the give-away marketing.

Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 pro#

The ones I know who are making some professional use of a DAW are all using Pro Tools, Cubase, StudioOne or SONAR. Of the "serious DAW users" I know, 80% are non in it professionally, even for part time income, and they tend to go for Reaper or some of the Mac stuff. But I also think most Sonar users (a relatively sophisticated, objective, knowledgeable crowd) would agree that for the "price performance" that SONAR delivers today, it is very under-represented in the market.

Alesis dm6 reaper steven slate drums 4 software#

But in spite of seeing this kind of speculation on this forum for years, I have never seen anyone (customer or employee of Cakewalk) answer this simple question.Īnd most have to do with "marketing partnerships", who's giving away their software with everything 79.00 piece of hardware equals name recognition and those recording no more than two or four channels limited use will never change from the "freeware", then tell their friends what they're using, and so on.

Facebook does not keep its user base a trade secret, and GM will disseminate its sales to the media without undue hesitation even when it is embarrassing. A simpler question, and one that could be definitively answered easily (and an answer that is presumably already known with some certainty) is: How many licensed copies of SONAR are out there? So why is the answer to that question so difficult to find in any public space? Most companies are happy to publish their market penetration, unless it is either 1) likely to get them looked at too closely as a monopoly or 2) so low as to be an embarrassment that will further depress sales or company value. Of course we regular visitors to this forum think SONAR is great. As for a biased sample, nowhere will you find a sample as hideously unscientific as the contributions of the fanboys on this forum. Many people own several DAW's and use only one, so without asking a random sample about their actual SONAR use, the question remains a mystery. Of course that question is more or less unanswerable except by the difficult and expensive methodology of an unbiased survey.

It has been a matter of speculation on this forum for years: How many customers are actually using SONAR? Or a variant: How many use SONAR relative to other DAW's.